Pascal’s Wager and the Making of Prudent Decisions: Active versus Passive

Welcome to MutualFunds.com. Please help us personalize your experience.

Select the one that best describes you

Thank you!

Check your email and confirm your subscription to complete your personalized experience.

Thank you for your submission, we hope you enjoy your experience

uncertain decisions path

News

Pascal’s Wager and the Making of Prudent Decisions: Active versus Passive

Larry Swedroe Sep 01, 2015



TIPS versus Nominal Bonds


On the other hand, with TIPS, you win either way. If inflation does show up, the return on your bonds will keep pace. Even with deflation, as long as you bought the TIPS without any accumulated inflation adjustment, they should do at least as well as inflation because TIPS mature at par. Per the logic behind Pascal’s Wager, the consequences of your decision should dominate the probability of outcomes, making TIPS the prudent choice in most cases.


Active versus Passive Funds


Given that investors are risk averse and the pain of a loss is much greater than the joy of an equivalent gain, Pascal’s Wager leads the way to a prudent decision: Become a passive investor.

Helping with this decision is the weight of academic, peer-reviewed research, which shows both that the majority of active funds underperform and that there’s no persistence of outperformance beyond the randomly expected.

Studies have also found the few funds that manage to beat their benchmark, on average, do so by a relatively small amount. On the other hand, funds that underperform do so, on average, by much larger amounts. One study, which covered the 10-year period from 1982 through 1991, found that because the few outperforming funds tended to beat their benchmarks by small amounts while the underperforming funds (a large majority) tended to miss by much wider margins, the risk-adjusted odds of outperforming an appropriate benchmark on an after-tax basis was 38 to 1.


The Ownership of Company Stock


Consider two outcomes. The first is one in which the company does well. If that’s the case, the employee will also likely do well, regardless of whether or not s/he owns lots of company stock. The outlook would be bright for pay increases, bonuses, promotions and even more stock options or stock grants.
On the other hand, if the company does poorly, the employee could face a case of double jeopardy. Not only will the portfolio take a devastating hit, but the employee may find themselves without a job due to layoffs or even bankruptcy. The consequences of decisions should dominate the probability of outcomes.

There are many other examples of how Pascal’s Wager can help us make prudent financial decisions. For example, in the current low interest rate environment, investors seeking incremental cash flow may decide to take more credit risk than they would normally.

Pascal would say that’s a bad idea because it takes an awful lot of interest to make up for unpaid principal. Or, those same investors might decide to extend bond maturities longer than they would normally to earn a term premium. But doing so takes on increased inflation risk.


The Bottom Line


Popular Articles

Download Our Free Report

Why 30 trillion is invested in mutual funds book