But not everybody is on board with the ESG movement.
ESG and socially responsible investing (SRI) has quickly become a flash-point for various political pundits and lawmakers. That’s gone as far as bans and new laws prohibiting the use of ESG metrics in investment decisions. The question now is whether or not the movement will be seriously impacted or grow even stronger from the recent laws.
Don’t forget to check out ESG Channel to explore investing trends in the ESG space.
Citing BlackRock’s focus on ESG, green energy, and being anti-fossil fuels, the Texas state legislator was the first to rally against ESG. This included the state writing legislation that forced pension funds, state universities, and other state entities to not use a set of asset managers and banks that have an ESG tilt. Florida soon followed with its own set of laws and rules banning pension and state fund managers from using ESG in decision making.
There are now more than 21 states with anti-ESG laws and rules on their books and more than 35 additional anti-ESG bills pending. Moreover, Florida governor Ron DeSantis recently created a coalition of 19 states to use their pension funds to undermine ESG efforts in the United States. By using their capital together, the hope is they can push policy and stop ESG investing.
The anti-ESG fervor has even reached the federal level. A recent bill—which was vetoed by President Biden—looked at removing recent Department of Labor considerations with regard to ESG investing in retirement plans.
For starters, for every anti-ESG bill, there seems to be another Democrat-led state introducing a pro-ESG bill. California continues to push for its massive CalPERs and CalSTERs pension funds to divest of fossil fuels and use ESG screening in their investment decisions. New York has followed suit with similar demands for its various state pension funds. The same could be said for New England. Given the size of many of these funds, the capital flowing into ESG funds has continued to eclipse much of the flows out.
And there is evidence that even some of the anti-ESG states are rethinking their decisions. Recently, the Republican-controlled North Dakota House of Representatives voted down legislation boycotting investment firms with ESG policies, citing the potential harm to its own state’s banks. Kentucky’s $7.9 billion County Employees Retirement System went against a recent governor decree that would have it divesting from BlackRock, citing that complying would be “inconsistent with our fiduciary duty and responsibility.” Finally, Indiana rebuked an anti-ESG law after analysis found its main pension fund would lose out on about $6.7 billion in gains over a ten-year period by shifting from its ESG-focused asset managers.
Even Texas may be considering a softer approach on ESG. A recent study from the Chicago Fed showed that in its two years of enactment, Texas municipalities saw their borrowing costs increase by about $500 million after being forced to boycott lenders and asset managers.
If there’s one thing that’s been good from all the anti-ESG bills, it has to be the current trend of greenwashing. Thanks to the popularity of ESG, Wall Street has slapped ‘ESG/SRI’ on every other fund and product. The various anti-ESG laws have continued to expose several of these and now investors have been moving toward ‘pure’ ESG investments.
Second, ESG may be a trend that investors will be forced to do on their own. Depending on what state you live in, access to ESG could be an asset allocation decision with your private money, even outside 401ks and similar qualified retirement plans. As the DOL rules continue to be challenged, it might be some time before we see ESG funds in your retirement plan. And that means going the ESG route on your own.
Take a look at our recently launched Model Portfolios to see how you can rebalance your portfolio.