Welcome to MutualFunds.com
Please help us personalize your experience and select the one that best describes you.
Your personalized experience is almost ready.
Check your email and confirm your subscription to complete your personalized experience.
Thank you for your submission
We hope you enjoy your experience
Despite spring training games being canceled due to the COVID-19 pandemic, regular season games began in late July. However, it’s not simply cardboard cutout fans who look different this year. Teams’ hometown financial situations aren’t playing out as in years past, either.
The argument for using municipal financing to support stadiums and arenas is justifiable. Professional sports teams rally community pride. Games generate increased consumer spending. First-class venues can elevate a city’s profile and spur additional development nearby. Not to mention, the construction of such large facilities can create thousands of new (albeit temporary) jobs1.
However, opponents’ stance also makes sense. Municipal financing might be better reserved for infrastructure or education projects that have the potential to increase productivity and promote economic growth over the long term2.
Regardless of how stadium financing is structured, the practice has been popular to support pro sports teams – illustrated by the following chart, which shows federal subsidies (in millions) for pro sports stadiums since 2000.
Since 2000, 40% of $17 billion in sports-related bonds were backed by taxes on tourism and other connected revenues. Support for these debt markets is drying up rapidly, but the severity of each city’s financial situation varies by individual exposure. Due to the pre-lockdown Super Bowl event, Miami Dade has collected twice the amount needed to cover interest payments on Marlins Park. However, Glendale’s stadiums and arenas represent two-thirds of the city’s public debt – a significant liability to cover without the economic boost of professional sporting events.
According to municipal analysts at Well Fargo Advisors, “The diverse revenue streams and reserve funds securing rated professional sports facility bonds should adequately protect bondholders during a short-term work-stoppage. However, … a prolonged downturn in consumer spending … makes this sector particularly susceptible to negative ratings actions and even payment defaults for the weakest credits.”3
So, when faced with an economic shutdown and global pandemic such as COVID-19, what’s the verdict on stadium bonds? Like many other things in 2020, they contain uncertainty but present a unique opportunity to reconsider the big picture. It’s time for cities to put all their cards on the table, dig into how they generate, maintain and reinvest revenue, and possibly start talking about a trade.
Wayne Anderman CFP® MBA is the founder of Anderman Wealth Partners, based in the Greater Fort Lauderdale Area, and a registered representative of Avantax Investment ServicesSM. Member FINRA, SIPC. Investment advisory services offered through Avantax Advisory ServicesSM.
These opinions are based on Wayne Anderman’s observations and research and are not intended to predict or depict performance of any investment. These views are as of the close of business on 08/31/2020 and are subject to change based on subsequent developments. Information is based on sources believed to be reliable; however, their accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed. These views should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
3 Wells Fargo Advisors Municipal Insights COVID-19 – Municipal Bond Impact Quick Takes. 4/27/2020